Volume 12 Issue 1 (2016)
Main Articles

Lessons for Research Policy and Practice: The Case of Co-enquiry Research With Rural Communities

Emily Caruso
Global Diversity Foundation
Bio
Christoph Schunko
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
Bio
Esteve Corbera
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Isabel Ruiz Mallén
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Christian R. Vogl
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
Gary Martin
Global Diversity Foundation
Susana Arrázola
Universidad Mayor San Simón
Fábio Pedro Bandeira
Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana
Diana Calvo Boyero
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Claudia Camacho Benavides
Global Diversity Foundation
Thiago Mota Cardoso
Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana
Albert Chan-Dzul
Consejo Regional Indígena y Popular de Xpujil
Esther Conde
Centro Boliviano de Investigación y Desarrollo Socio-Integral
Carlos del Campo García
Global Diversity Foundation
Tomás Huanca
Centro Boliviano de Investigación y Desarrollo Socio-Integral
José Augusto Laranjeiras Sampaio
Asociação Nacional de Ação Indigenista
Sara Oliveros Lopez
Consejo Regional Indígena y Popular de Xpujil
Luciana Porter-Bolland
Instituto de Ecología, A.C.
Olga Ruiz Betancourt
Universidad Mayor San Simón
Published July 27, 2016
Keywords
  • European Commission,
  • civil society organisations,
  • co-enquiry,
  • Latin America,
  • participatory research,
  • research funding,
  • research partnership,
  • research policy,
  • Seventh Framework Programme
  • ...More
    Less

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between institutional funding for research and community-based or co-enquiry research practice. It examines the implementation of co-enquiry research in the COMBIOSERVE project, which was funded by the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme for research and innovation, between the years 2012 and 2015. Research partnerships between Latin American and European civil society organisations, research institutions, and Latin American rural communities are analysed. Challenges for effective collaboration in co-enquiry and lessons learned for research policy and practice are outlined. Based on our case study we suggest that: (1) the established values and practices of academia seem largely unfavourable towards alternative forms of research, such as co-enquiry; (2) the policies and administrative practices of this European Commission funding are unsuitable for adopting participatory forms of enquiry; and (3) the approach to research funding supports short engagements with communities whereas long-term collaborations are more desirable. Based on our case study, we propose more flexible funding models that support face-to-face meetings between researchers and communities from the time of proposal drafting, adaptation of research processes to local dynamics, adaptation of administrative processes to the capacities of all participants, and potential for long-term collaborations. Large-scale funding bodies such as European Commission research programmes are leaders in the evolution of research policy and practice. They have the power and the opportunity to publicly acknowledge the value of partnerships with civil society organisations and communities, actively support co-enquiry, and foment interest in innovative forms of research.